HomeStablecoinsLiving Off Dividends - $40,000 per year!! #dividendinvesting

Living Off Dividends – $40,000 per year!! #dividendinvesting

-


Living off dividends and financial freedom from dividend investing is such a huge accomplishment. Here is the math to learn how you can live off of dividends and have passive income fund your early retirement. Best dividend stocks for passive income have great dividend yields!

#passiveincome #dividendstocks

*not financial advice

source

22 COMMENTS

  1. Your math is needlessly complicated for what you are calculating. Just divide your dividend income goal by the fund's dividend yield to calculate how much you need to invest into each fund….there is no need to involve the price of the stock/fund.

  2. The trap is looking at yield and thinking you need less money with a higher yielding asset. NAV erosion is real and choosing a quality asset is always better than a higher yielding one.

  3. One thing to consider is if a company is paying out big dividends it means they aren’t spending their cash wisely so the stock price won’t grow as fast as a lower dividend paying company

  4. Hey man. Don't do it that way. Just take the living expense and divide by the dividend yield. This gives you the value of stock you need to own. Divide this by the stock price for the necessary number of shares.

  5. Dividends from SCHD are generally taxed at the qualified dividend rate, often providing a tax advantage over ordinary income rates for many investors. However, current market attention is centered on Nvidia, which has significantly contributed to the S&P 500’s recent earnings growth. Nvidia’s stock, up over 90% year-to-date, gained another 2.5% on Monday in New York, propelling the Nasdaq 100 to a new record high. I’m actively seeking new opportunities to enhance performance within my $350K portfolio and open to strategic ideas.

  6. Such a dumb goal. No meaningful difference between share price appreciation and dividends. Hence, the person you spoke of really wants to live off their investment income. However, then we must understand that the investment rate return is not the same as the sustainable rate of withdrawal from a portfolio. Then you’ve forgotten taxes. So basically the logic here is flawed on a many levels. Pretty worthless unless you’re just doing an algebra lesson.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

LATEST POSTS

Ethereum whales add $1B in ETH — Is the accumulation trend hinting at a $5K ETH price?

Numerous cohorts of Ethereum addresses added over 330,000 ETH in the last two weeks. Is this a sign that a $5,000 ETH price is...

FP CryptoDecoded: Benefits and Challenges of Cryptocurrencies

Proponents say cryptocurrencies have resulted in greater financial accountability in countries with corrupt banking systems. But critics cite the environmental costs of bitcoin mining and...

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink Forecasts $700K Bitcoin Price Amid Inflation Worries

Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, recently speculated that Bitcoin could potentially reach valuations as high as $700,000 per BTC. This projection arises against the...

Most Popular